Improved resolution of glutamate, glutamine and γ‐aminobutyric acid with optimized point‐resolved spectroscopy sequence timings for their simultaneous quantification at 9.4 T

Skip to Navigation

EarlyView Article

  • Published: Nov 3, 2017
  • Author: Brennen J. Dobberthien, Anthony G. Tessier, Atiyah Yahya
  • Journal: NMR in Biomedicine

Glutamine (Gln), glutamate (Glu) and γ‐aminobutyric acid (GABA) are relevant brain metabolites that can be measured with magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS). This work optimizes the point‐resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) sequence echo times, TE1 and TE2, for improved simultaneous quantification of the three metabolites at 9.4 T. Quantification was based on the proton resonances of Gln, Glu and GABA at ≈2.45, ≈2.35 and ≈2.28 ppm, respectively. Glu exhibits overlap with both Gln and GABA; in addition, the Gln peak is contaminated by signal from the strongly coupled protons of N‐acetylaspartate (NAA), which resonate at about 2.49 ppm. J‐coupling evolution of the protons was characterized numerically and verified experimentally. A {TE1, TE2} combination of {106 ms, 16 ms} minimized the NAA signal in the Gln spectral region, whilst retaining Gln, Glu and GABA peaks. The efficacy of the technique was verified on phantom solutions and on rat brain in vivo. LCModel was employed to analyze the in vivo spectra. The average T2‐corrected Gln, Glu and GABA concentrations were found to be 3.39, 11.43 and 2.20 mM, respectively, assuming a total creatine concentration of 8.5 mM. LCModel Cramér–Rao lower bounds (CRLBs) for Gln, Glu and GABA were in the ranges 14–17%, 4–6% and 16–19%, respectively. The optimal TE resulted in concentrations for Gln and GABA that agreed more closely with literature concentrations compared with concentrations obtained from short‐TE spectra acquired with a {TE1, TE2} combination of {12 ms, 9 ms}. LCModel estimations were also evaluated with short‐TE PRESS and with the optimized long TE of {106 ms, 16 ms}, using phantom solutions of known metabolite concentrations. It was shown that concentrations estimated with LCModel can be inaccurate when combined with short‐TE PRESS, where there is peak overlap, even when low (<20%) CRLBs are reported.

Social Links

Share This Links

Bookmark and Share

Microsites

Suppliers Selection
Societies Selection

Banner Ad

Click here to see
all job opportunities

Most Viewed

Copyright Information

Interested in separation science? Visit our sister site separationsNOW.com

Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All Rights Reserved